Franchises have been the name of the plot in Hollywood for age , and Warner Bros. has been enfranchisement - heavy more than most . Between variousDC movies , thedifferent Conjuring films , and whatever else , the studio apartment has had a large enfranchisement push over the last decade . But for current CEODavid Zaslav , the companionship has n’t been use them enough to his liking .
During a late Goldman Sachs league , Zaslav expressed a desire to expand upon WB ’s biggest franchises . Specifically , he thinks “ content ” such as DC , along with the the like of Lord of the Rings , have been “ underused . ” To him , what get to Warner Bros. stand out from other studio is “ the great IP that [ it ] owns , ” he sound out . “ But for us , the challenge is … we have n’t done anything with Harry Potter for more than a decade . We have n’t done anything with Lord of the Rings . ”
DC is in the midst of embark on up its 10 - year - plan fromJames Gunn and Peter Safran , with the first official project being Gunn ’s Superman Legacy in 2025 . As for Lord of the Rings , it ’s know that WB is working onmore movies , such as the 2024 gum anime prequelWar of the Rohirrim . In the event of Harry Potter , that ’s more of a technicality than anything else : Zaslav is specifically referring to plastic film set around or after the timeline of the original movie , which conveniently distances the three Fantastic Beasts pic ( the last of which , Secrets of Dumbledore , come out back in 2022 ) . That niche is expected to be filled by a TV version of the original leger , which he said will be given for “ 10 consecutive years . ”

Image: Warner Bros./DC Comics
[ viaTheWrap ]
Want more io9 news ? Check out when to bear the latestMarvel , Star Wars , andStar Trekreleases , what ’s next for theDC Universe on movie and TV , and everything you need to know about the future ofDoctor Who .
Daily Newsletter
Get the best tech , scientific discipline , and culture news in your inbox daily .
News from the future , delivered to your present tense .
You May Also Like















![]()