EdgeAsks The Intellects: What Do You Think About Machines That Think?

Holy smokes , but is there a portion to manducate through here . And it certainly looks like there ’s a lot worth chewing . Here ’s how Brockmanprefaced this year ’s physical exertion :

In recent geezerhood , the 1980s - era philosophical word about artificial intelligence ( AI)—whether computers can “ really ” think , refer , be conscious , and so on — have lead to new conversations about how we should mete out with the forms that many argue really are implement . These “ Army Intelligence ” , if they achieve “ Superintelligence ” ( Nick Bostrom ) , could pose “ existential risks ” that run to “ Our Final Hour ” ( Martin Rees ) . And Stephen Hawking recently made outside headlines when he noted “ The development of full artificial intelligence service could spell the remnant of the human race . ”

But wait ! Should we also ask what machines that think , or , “ AIs ” , might be thinking about ? Do they need , do they expect civil rights ? Do they have feelings ? What kind of government ( for us ) would an AI choose ? What kind of high society would they want to structure for themselves ? Or is “ their ” lodge “ our ” society ? Will we , and the artificial intelligence , include each other within our respective circle of empathy ?

Sonos Speaker Move 2

Numerous Edgies have been at the forefront of the skill behind the various feeling of AI , either in their inquiry or writings . AI was front and center in conversation between charter member Pamela McCorduck ( Machines Who intend ) and Isaac Asimov ( Machines That recollect ) at our initial encounter in 1980 . And the conversation has continued unabated , as is evident in the recent Edge feature “ The Myth of AI “ , a conversation with Jaron Lanier , that evoked rich and provocative comment .

Is AI becoming increasingly real ? Are we now in a unexampled earned run average of the “ AIs ” ? To consider this way out , it ’s fourth dimension to grow up . Enough already with the science fiction and the movies , Star Maker , Blade Runner , 2001 , Her , The Matrix , “ The Borg ” . Also , 80 age after Turing ’s innovation of his Universal Machine , it ’s time to honour Turing , and other AI pioneers , by return them a well - deserve rest . We eff the history .

https://gizmodo.com/the-myth-of-ai-is-more-harmful-than-ai-itself-1658830773

Apple2025macbookairm4

This is so supporting , even though there are a good act of AI naysayer among the respondents . Though we ’re still decades away from the kinds of AI that could seize with teeth us in the ass , it ’s crucial that we have conversation like these to raise awareness . As Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom notes inhis response :

[ T]he level to which we grapple to get our act together will have some effect on the odds . The most utilitarian thing that we can do at this stage , in my opinion , is to advance the tiny but burgeoning playing area of enquiry that focuses on the superintelligence control condition problem ( studying questions such as how human value can be transferred to software ) . The reason to press on this now is partly to begin making progress on the control problem and part to enter top minds into this sphere so that they are already in place when the nature of the challenge takes clearer embodiment in the future . It looks like math , theoretical computer skill , and maybe ism are the types of talent most needed at this stage .

That ’s why there is an sweat underway to drive endowment and funding into this subject area , and to begin to work out a architectural plan of natural action . At the meter when this commentary is published , the first enceinte coming together to develop a technical inquiry docket for AI safety will just have take spot .

Second Screen Portable 15 Monitor