While plenty ofmovie sequelsnever quite go up to the high standards arrange by the originals , others go on to outstrip their first installmentsat the box officeand / or inreviews and evaluation .
Thanks to Ranker , you’re able to see how your personal opinions about certain sequels measure up against those of the masses . The crowdsourced grade site act host to a tilt of thebest pic sequels of all clip , as vote on by anyone with an net connexion . The ranking system of rules is more complex than just ordinate the films from most to few votes . you’re able to upvote or downvote a movie , so the algorithm accounts not only for the number of upvotes , but the proportion of upvotes to downvotes , too . Voters also have the option to re - rank a list altogether , and the algorithm consecrate extra system of weights to re - ranker ’ votes .
“ Yeah , it ’s complicated , ” Rankerexplainson the site . “ But we ’ve done a tidy sum of testing and days of data - science to regulate that the order of a tilt on Ranker is about as exact as anyone can get . ”
According to the results , The Dark Knight , Christopher Nolan ’s 2008 follow - up to 2005’sBatman Begins , is the best movie subsequence ever made . Terminator 2 : Judgment Day(1991 ) andStar Wars : Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back(1980 ) round out the top three . The tilt has something for just about every kind ofmovieviewer , from cinephiles ( 1974’sThe Godfather Part IIcame in fifth place ) to kids ( Shrek 2andToy Story 2both made the top 15 ) .
It ’s also deserving noting thatsequelin this context means the 2nd film in a series — not just any film that derive after the first one . For example , Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secretsqualifies ( and took the 21st dapple ) , but none of the other Harry Potter films do .
see out what else made the top 25 below — and if you ’re umbrageous at the conspicuous absence of say , Paddington 2 , you ’re always welcome to upvote it on thefull list .
[ h / tRanker ]
